MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393236920 · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2024.100139

Pictures and processes: The use of autophotography to illustrate the experience of physical activity engagement in motherhood

2024· article· en· W4393236920 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser ValleyBrock UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersBrock University
KeywordsPsychologyPhysical activityDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyAestheticsMedicineArtPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss using the qualitative arts-based method of autophotography by sharing our experiences conducting three studies with postpartum women as they navigated the psychosocial challenges of physical activity (PA) engagement. In working with this population, we used autophotography in conjunction with feminist theory by centering participants’ voices, highlighting the presence of the gendered expectations of motherhood in PA engagement, and providing tools for transformation and empowerment. Throughout our paper, we reflect on the process of conducting autophotography in our studies with postpartum women and theorize how this method provided an important medium for mothers to share their voices and stories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.699
GPT teacher head0.711
Teacher spread0.012 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it