MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393243636 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v8i3.2382

Millets: A Review On Its Nutritional Potential And Application

2022· review· en· W4393243636 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jayanti Ballabh, Mansi Nautiyal, Raja Joshi, Rajendra Prasad, Neha Saini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLeaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Millets, which are rarely utilized cereals but rank sixth in protein content, are significant producers of phytochemicals, particularly lipophilic compounds, and are cultivated in both Africa and Asia. Several distinct varieties of millets are discussed in this overview, along with its history, consumption, types, and a variety of additional applications. Millet grains come in a broad range of strengths when it comes to their phenolic content and their antioxidant capability. In addition, millet grain phenolics, which are readily accessible, possess biological features that are resistant to a number of pathophysiological diseases. Moreover, they may act as natural antioxidants in food and contribute to the food security of millions of people. Millet grain is not only a rich source of nutrients but also contains a variety of beneficial compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.385
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.076 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicLeaf Properties and Growth MeasurementFrench-language works237,207