Critical Pedagogies for Mobilities Studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A dozen scholars of mobilities studies traveled to Waterloo (Canada) in 2018 for Mobilities Pedagogies: A Symposium on Theories, Practices, and Networks. Discussion questions focused on pedagogies for mobilities studies, mobilities as pedagogies, and mobilizing pedagogies. This article synthesizes participants’ written responses to these questions and our subsequent in-person conversations. It describes our critical pedagogies and how they are inspired by the mobile ontology of theories and methods for mobilities studies and by the project of critical pedagogy as means for justice, community, hope, and compassion. Walking and other journeys together emerge as core pedagogical strategies from among other mobile encounters, collaborations, and creative ruptures for encouraging critical engagement and reflexivity. Concluding remarks broach how our critical pedagogies might intersect with movements for mobility justice and for decolonization in postsecondary education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it