MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393255242 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2024.2331945

Editorial: Special issue on operations research and machine learning

2024· editorial· en· W4393255242 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Marzieh Soltanolkottabi, Richard Allmendinger, Uwe Aickelin

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many machine learning techniques work through optimizing specific objective functions.Supervised learning techniques are to minimize the prediction error such as mean square error (MSE) and misclassification rate, or maximize the conditional likelihood, posterior probability, etc. Unsupervised learning techniques usually group instances into clusters in a way that instances within each group are optimally similar while they are distant from instances in other groups.In reinforcement learning, the goal of an agent is to maximize its cumulative reward.However, there is still room to exploit optimization and operations research (OR) in machine learning, and vice versa.Both machine learning and OR can gain advantages through integration and interaction.Optimization and OR techniques play a pivotal role in mitigating machine learning challenges.From feature selection to handling incomplete data and imbalance learning, they can enhance model accuracy and diversity.Their versatile applications encompass addressing bias, selecting optimal training sets, and developing classifiers that minimize misclassification errors across classes, offering comprehensive solutions to multiple machine learning hurdles.Every machine learning technique has several hyperparameters that should be tuned to select the model that achieves the best performance on the learning task at hand.Normally, there are multiple criteria (or objectives) such as bias, variance, complexity, level of explainability, and fairness to be considered in model selection.The existing approach to address multiple criteria in machine learning is to transform the problem into a single-objective optimization problem using, for example, a weighted sum approach.However, this bears the issue of setting the importance of objectives in one way or the other, which is not a straightforward task, nor does the single solution to a multi-objective problem provide insights into the trade-offs between the objectives being optimized.Multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decisionmaking as OR techniques can provide an opportunity to meet these criteria in machine learning.On the other hand, machine learning techniques can contribute to finding the optimal solutions and making the best decision efficiently.Machine learning techniques can automate the process of the problem reduction in combinatorial optimization.Unsupervised learning can be used in Pareto pruning methods for multi-(or many-) objective optimization problems.Supervised learning can guide solutions through iterations to achieve convergence faster.Reinforcement learning can learn optimal controllers during the optimization process to improve the performance of optimizers.We are pleased to publish this special issue on 'Operations Research and Machine Learning' consisting of five articles.In 'Real-Time Production Scheduling Using a Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Multi-Agent Approach', Namoura et al. introduce a novel Deep Reinforcement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207