MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393261297 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110315

Reversible Logic Gates and Applications – A Low Power Solution to VLSI Chips

2024· article· en· W4393261297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum-Dot Cellular Automata
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationLogic gatePower (physics)Pass transistor logicComputer scienceUltra low powerElectronic engineeringArithmeticElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceEmbedded systemEngineeringElectronic circuitMathematicsDigital electronicsPhysicsPower consumptionAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, reversible logic gates have garnered significant interest because of their potential to decrease energy consumption and meet the growing need for low-power computing systems.Unlike conventional logic gates, reversible logic gates ensure that no information loss happens during computation, allowing for the reversal of the entire computation process.This unique characteristic opens up new avenues for developing energy-efficient digital circuits.This review paper serves as a vital contribution to the field by addressing a noticeable gap in the existing literature regarding reversible logic gates.The study not only comprehensively analyzes the array of reversible logic gates available but also underscores their practical applications and significance.It encompasses a wide variety of reversible logic gates, including Toffoli gates, Fredkin gates, and newer innovations.It is found that Toffoli gates outperformed in terms of gate count and quantum cost reduction, making them a preferred choice for quantum circuit optimization.Additionally, Fredkin gates showed exceptional performance in specific applications, like data swapping and quantum state control.The digital circuits like adders, multiplexers, ALU etc. are successfully designed using reversible gates like HNG, DKG etc.The significant gap this study fills lies in the need for a consolidated and in-depth analysis of the state-of-the-art reversible logic gates and their real-world utility.While prior research has discussed these gates individually, this paper takes a novel approach by offering a holistic assessment of their performance, quantum cost, gate count, and practical applications, thereby presenting a comprehensive resource for researchers, engineers, and designers in the field.This innovative contribution plays a pivotal role in shaping the progress of energy-efficient and quantum computing systems as well as in optimizing VLSI chip designs for various applications, with a particular emphasis on enhancing cryptographic and data processing capabilities.The findings of this review aim to stimulate further research and development in reversible computing, contributing to the advancement of energy-efficient and information-preserving computing systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it