The management of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (Kaba Yoni) by Siddha herbo-mineral formulation Linga Chenduram through In-Vitro study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Candidiasis are common oral and genital infection in humans and nowadays candida species have shown resistance against various synthetic medicines. Linga Chenduram is mentioned in Siddha classical literature and indicated for Mega Noi (Sexually Transmitted Disease). Linga Chenduram was subjected to assess antifungal activity. Methods: The antifungal activity of the sample was tested for Candida albicans ATCC 10231 to Determine the diameter of inhibition zone (DIZ) by disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods, Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and Minimum fungicidal activities (MFC). Result: The study results revealed that the DIZ for 100µg of Clotrimazole, 500μg, and 1000μg of sample drug is found to be 29mm, 14mm, and 17mm respectively. MIC 50 Value of Linga Chenduram is 281.086µg/ml. Conclusions: So it can be concluded that Linga Chenduram possesses effective antifungal activity against Candida albicans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".