MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393274557 · doi:10.1515/9781501774164-003

Chapter 2 Trade A New Open Door

2024· book-chapter· en· W4393274557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCornell University Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The China market attracted countless Americans due to the economic woes of the 1970s.The Arab oil embargo in October 1973 exacerbated the scourge of stagflation, while growing competition with the Western Europeans and the Japanese enervated US firms.Beijing's hefty orders in 1972 alone-$2.3 million for one RCA satellite communication ground station; $150 million for ten Boeing 707 airplanes; and $18 million for three hundred thousand tons of corn-came as an auspicious sign.13 When more and more Americans arrived in China in search of business, they resembled, in the words of John Alioto, CEO of Pacific Far East Line, "a man who has been starving for some time."14 Frederick Dent cautioned the National Council membership, presciently, that the China market would not be "a panacea for our economic difficulties."15 Sino-American trade grew from virtually zero to about $3 billion by the end of the decade, but it remained only a trickle of the total US trade volume ($400 billion in 1979).As had been the case for centuries, however, the future, not the pre sent, of the China market captivated Americans.Chinese businesspeople across ranks-bureaucrats at the Foreign Trade Ministry, officials at the CCPIT, and representatives of the FTCs-were ready to trade with the Americans.Although Beijing cut back foreign trade by 15 percent between 1966 and 1969 in a bid for self-sufficiency, stagnant economic growth, particularly in agriculture, prompted Chinese leaders, Mao included, to abjure autarky.The trade volume bounced back from $4 billion in 1969 to $14.6 billion in 1974.16 A month after Richard Nixon's visit, the Foreign Trade Ministry circulated an urgent notice, declaring the resumption of Sino-American trade "on the basis of equality and mutual benefit."17 The Chinese were trying to kill two birds-economic and political-with one stone.At the National Foreign Trade Work Conference in January 1973, Vice Premier Li Xiannian forecast a "considerable" increase in trade, which would accelerate economic development.He then added: "From the viewpoint of diplomacy, we often trade with cap i tal ist countries first and then establish diplomatic relations."18 Beijing had done so with Canada, Italy, Britain, Japan, West Germany, and Australia; now it turned to the United States.No one could fathom in 1972 what, how, and how much the United States and China would be trading in the next few years.By 1979, however, the idea that economic access across the Pacific would one day accrue a fortune on both sides underpinned bilateral relations.This chapter explains the rise of this idea.The first section analyzes the initial market euphoria, particularly in the US business community, which soon evaporated due to the political and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0190.013
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2930.092

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.046 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornell University Press eBooks→Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→