PERAN MASYARAKAT LOKAL DALAM KEBIJAKAN PENGEMBANGAN PARIWISATA DESA FATUMNASI, TIMOR TENGAH SELATAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kabupaten Timor Tengah selatan merupakan salah satu kabupaten di Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur terdiri memiliki banyak potensi alam yang dapat dikembangkan. Salah satu potensi alamnya adalah objek wisata alam yang banyak terdapat di desa Fatumnasi untuk menggerakkan potensi alam tersebut maka dibutuhkan peran serta dari masyarakat local untuk turut membantu kebijakan pemerintah dalam mengembangkan potensi dari desa tersebut Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan melalui wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif kualitatif.menggunakan model analisis Miles & Huberman. Penelitian ini berusaha untuk mendapatkan rumusan peran warga masyarakat dengan mendasarkan pada empat dimensi kebijakan public yang sering di sebut Model Edwar III yaitu terdiri atas komunikasi,sumber daya,sikap pelaksana dan struktur birokrasi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".