MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393278147 · doi:10.51594/ijmer.v6i3.964

THE ROLE OF AI IN MARKETING PERSONALIZATION: A THEORETICAL EXPLORATION OF CONSUMER ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES

2024· article· en· W4393278147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsHamilton Medical Research Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalizationCustomer engagementMarketingBusinessPsychologyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebSocial media

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in personalizing marketing strategies. It delves into the theoretical underpinnings of consumer engagement sand investigates how AI can be leveraged to develop targeted and relevant marketing experiences. AI can personalize messages based on consumer behavior and demographics, influencing the processing route and maximizing engagement. This theory explores the use of game mechanics to motivate and engage users. AI can personalize gamified marketing experiences, tailoring rewards and challenges to individual consumer preferences, driving deeper engagement. Algorithms can analyze vast amounts of customer data to predict individual preferences and behaviors. This allows for targeted advertising, product recommendations, and content that resonates with specific consumer segments. Natural Language Processing (NLP), AI-powered NLP tools analyze customer reviews, social media conversations, and other forms of unstructured data. This allows brands to understand customer sentiment and personalize communication styles for optimal engagement AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants can provide personalized customer support and product recommendations in real-time, fostering a more interactive and engaging brand experience. Potential Benefits and Considerations Personalized marketing messages and experiences cater to individual needs and preferences, leading to higher satisfaction and loyalty. By tailoring content and offerings to specific consumer segments, brands can establish a more relevant and relatable image. Improved Conversion Rates, Personalized marketing campaigns can be highly targeted and effective, leading to increased conversions and sales. Balancing personalization with data privacy concerns is crucial. Transparency and user control over data collection practices are essential. AI algorithms can perpetuate biases present in training data. Ensuring fairness and inclusivity in AI-powered marketing is paramount. AI is revolutionizing marketing personalization. By leveraging AI's analytical capabilities and understanding the theoretical aspects of consumer engagement, brands can develop targeted and relevant marketing strategies that foster deeper customer connections and drive business growth. Keywords: AI Personalization, Consumer Engagement, Marketing Strategy, Theoretical Exploration, Data Privacy, Algorithmic Bias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it