MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393282374 · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102451

Directive clinique no 449 : Directive canadienne sur le diagnostic et les impacts de l’endométriose

2024· article· fr· W4393282374 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Sukhbir S. Singh, Catherine Allaire, Omar Al‐Nourhji, Olga Bougie, Philippa Bridge-Cook, Shauna Duigenan, Jamie Kroft, Madeleine Lemyre, Mathew Leonardi, Nicholas Leyland, Sarah Maheux‐Lacroix, Jocelyn M. Wessels, Kate Wahl, Paul J. Yong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceGynecologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0710.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada→Same topicEndometriosis Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→