Computing Bipath Multicommodity Flows with Constraint Programming–Based Branch-and-Price-and-Cut
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a constraint programming (CP)–based branch-and-price-and-cut framework to exactly solve bipath multicommodity flow (MCF): an MCF problem with two paths for each demand. The goal is to route demands in a capacitated network under the minimum cost. The two paths must have disjoint arcs, and the delays accumulated along the two paths must be within a small deviation of each other. CP is used at multiple points in this framework: for solving pricing problems, for cut generation, and for primal and branching node heuristics. These modules use a CP solver designed for network routing problems and can be adapted to other combinatorial optimization problems. We also develop a novel, complete, two-level branching scheme. On a set of diverse bipath MCF instances, experimental results show that our algorithm significantly outperforms monolithic CP and mixed integer linear programming models and demonstrate the efficiency and flexibility brought by the tailored integration of linear programming and CP methodologies. History: Accepted by Pascal Van Hentenryck, Area Editor for Computational Modeling: Methods & Analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Huawei Technologies. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplemental Information ( https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0128 ) as well as from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2023.0128 ). The complete IJOC Software and Data Repository is available at https://informsjoc.github.io/ .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it