Impact of FED Rate and Energy Commodity Price on ASEAN Sustainable Stock Returns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable stocks have been associated with low risk and low returns but can be a good longterm investment portfolio option.After COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the global economy has been destabilized, leading to an increase in the FED rate and energy commodity prices, such as crude oil and crude palm oil (CPO).This study aims to examine the impact of these indicators on the returns of sustainable stock indexes in emerging markets such as ASEAN, specifically the member of ASEAN who have sustainable stock indexes i.e.Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand.Based on 475 research data, the study finds that crude oil and CPO prices have no significant effect on sustainable stock returns.In contrast, the FED rate has a significant negative effect on sustainable stock returns.Sustainable stocks appear to be resilient to crude oil and CPO price volatility, except for the FED rate.Therefore, investors may be less concerned about energy commodity price volatility in the post-COVID-19 period.However, investors seem more interested in shifting their investments to bank products with higher profit opportunities due to the FED rate increase and minimal risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".