MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393308871 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.190306

The Impact of Equatorial Proximity on Thermal Performance in Residential Apartment Spaces

2024· article· en· W4393308871 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shaymaa Salim Younus Al-Mashhadani, Hasan Abdulrazzaq Hasan Al. Sanjary

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApartmentArchitectural engineeringThermalEnvironmental scienceBusinessMeteorologyGeographyCivil engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since residential apartments are important sources of energy for the world's population, many excellent studies have examined how well-insulated buildings and apartment's function.However, because of the building's location relative to the equator, the impact of the building on climate data varies, and the role of engineering spaces within the apartment in influencing thermal performance was not discussed in most of these studies.The purpose of this research is to use ECOTECT2011 to examine the thermal loads of virtual residential areas in two different cities: Kuala Lambor, which is located close to the equator, and Mosul, which is located far from it.The study will also examine the ratio of thermal loads in each city to the other, the number of days of rest, and the thermal and transitional period in each city.According to the study's findings, there are more rest days and transition periods in the city close to the equator than in the city farther away.These findings may indicate that space engineering is less effective as a thermal treatment in areas close to thermal extremism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning→Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization→French-language works237,207→