Longitudinal analysis of genomic mutations in SARS-CoV-2 isolates from persistent COVID-19 patient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A primary reason for the ongoing spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the continuous acquisition of mutations by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, the mechanism of acquiring mutations is not fully understood. In this study, we isolated SARS-CoV-2 from an immunocompromized patient persistently infected with Omicron strain BF.5 for approximately 4 months to analyze its genome and evaluate drug resistance. Although the patient was administered the antiviral drug remdesivir (RDV), there were no acquired mutations in RDV binding site, and all isolates exhibited susceptibility to RDV. Notably, upon analyzing the S protein sequence of the day 119 isolate, we identified mutations acquired by mutant strains emerging from the BF.5 variant, suggesting that viral genome analysis in persistent COVID-19 patients may be useful in predicting viral evolution. These results suggest mutations in SARS-CoV-2 are acquired during long-term viral replication rather than in response to antiviral drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".