MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393315474 · doi:10.2172/2328220

Parallel-in-Time Methods for Method-of-Lines Discretizations of Nonlinear Hyperbolic PDEs and Systems (Final Report)

2024· report· en· W4393315474 on OpenAlexaff
Hans De Sterck, Oliver A. Krzysik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMultigrid methodNonlinear systemScalar (mathematics)Hyperbolic partial differential equationApplied mathematicsGridFocus (optics)MathematicsSimple (philosophy)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationPartial differential equationCalculus (dental)Mathematical analysisGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The work for the subcontract is situated in the area of parallel-in-time integration for hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs). Parallel-in-time integration is an active area of research due to its ability to enable faster numerical simulations for applications throughout many areas of science. The work in this subcontract builds on a variety of results that were obtained, as part of the work performed for Subcontract No. B648355, for the Multigrid Reduction-in-Time (MGRIT) method from [1] applied to hyperbolic PDEs. This subcontract extends these results further to more efficient methods and to the case of method-of-lines discretizations for nonlinear hyperbolic PDES and systems of PDEs. The following is a summary of the research performed and results achieved during milestone periods 1, 2 and 3 by the PI (Hans De Sterck) and Postdoctoral Research Associate (Oliver Krzysik), for required tasks 1-4 (as listed in the Statement of Work): Research over the previous year has been split into three main projects: (i) solution of acoustic equation system; (ii) solution of nonlinear scalar hyperbolic PDEs; (iii) solution of nonlinear hyperbolic systems of PDEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.216
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207