MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393315831 · doi:10.5539/jedp.v14n1p135

A Prototype Implementation of a Virtual Platform with Robotic Integration and Machine Learning Capabilities for the Execution of Cognitive Psychology Experiments in Children

2024· article· en· W4393315831 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christos Sakkas, Stavroula Samartzi, Harilaos Koumaras

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Educational and Developmental Psychology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyCognitionHuman–computer interactionCognitive psychologyCognitive scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Virtual platforms and autonomous robotic systems have recently gained a lot of attention due to the enormous growth of novel computational techniques, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, allowing various fields and processes to be transformed. Cognitive psychology is a field where such virtual platforms can be applied in order to enhance the current procedures and processes, offering an objective and non-intrusive method, for psychological tasks execution, especially in the case of children. More specifically, this paper presents a virtual platform, complemented with a robotic experimenter and a machine learning processing module, allowing the objective and neutral execution of psychological experiments and tasks to children, remotely or in person.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Educational and Developmental PsychologySame topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207