MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393317705 · doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2024.13.04

Adaptive Elastic Net on High-Dimensional Sparse Data with Multicollinearity: Application to Lipomatous Tumor Classification

2024· article· en· W4393317705 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Narumol Sudjai, Monthira Duangsaphon, Chandhanarat Chandhanayingyong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSiriraj Foundation
KeywordsMulticollinearityElastic net regularizationNet (polyhedron)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsFeature selectionRegression analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predictive models can experience instabilities because of the combination of high-dimensional sparse data and multicollinearity problems. The adaptive Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (adaptive Lasso) and adaptive elastic net were developed using the adaptive weight on penalty term. These adaptive weights are related to the power order of the estimators. Therefore, we concentrate on the power of adaptive weight on these penalty functions. This study purposed to compare the performances of the power of the adaptive Lasso and adaptive elastic net methods under high-dimensional sparse data with multicollinearity. Moreover, we compared the performances of the ridge, Lasso, elastic net, adaptive Lasso, and adaptive elastic net in terms of the mean of the predicted mean squared error (MPMSE) for the simulation study and the classification accuracy for a real-data application. The results of the simulation and the real-data application showed that the square root of the adaptive elastic net performed best on high-dimensional sparse data with multicollinearity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchSame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207