Cultural Dynamics of Gendered Spaces: Behavioral Influences in Amman's Outdoor Areas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research focuses on the anthropology of gendered spaces and their connection with cultural aspects.Reviewing previous literature confirms that the cultural dynamics of gendered spaces in Jordan have not been widely researched, therefore exploring this subject will contribute to knowledge.Theorizing the interpretation of gender in urban spaces can shed light on gaps among culture and urban theories and identify some crucial concepts in the cultural dynamics of gendered spaces.This research aims at exploring the influence of cultural aspects on the behavior of middle-aged users in outdoor spaces.The research highlights the importance of understanding the cultural dynamics of gendered spaces.A comparative study is conducted to compare the landscape patterns in the old parts of Amman with the modern parts.A mixed methods approach is used to increase the accuracy of the research outcomes.The research findings confirm that understanding the users' behaviors, perceptions, and activities is important when planning and designing outdoor spaces.It also confirms the influence of cultural aspects on the behavior of individuals, especially women.The Research findings will affect government policy, professional practice, and the quality of the built environment; it will add great value to the field of gender-sensitive planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".