Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sandflies are small insects whose lengths vary between 1 and 3 mm and rarely reach 5 mm.They have long legs and a densely hairy body and are generally brown, hence the nickname "straw mosquito".In the winged phase, sandflies show sexual dimorphism expressed not only in differences in body shape but also in feeding behavior, which is expressed in the exclusive hematophagy of females.In males, the proboscis's mouthparts are shorter and atrophied, unlike females, which have a longer proboscis, adapted to piercing the skin of vertebrates and sucking blood.[1-3].Locomotion is characterized by hopping flight and, unlike many.Diptera keep their wings erect when at rest.Sandflies have a pantropical distribution, with some species found in the regions of the Americas, they are distributed from the extreme south of Canada to the north of Argentina.Some species have a restricted, regional, or local distribution, while others have a broad continental distribution, resulting in wide overlapping ranges.Knowledge of the sand fly fauna proved to be of great importance due to the ability of these insects to transmit pathogens.In the New World, the genus Lutzomyia França, 1924, is the most important, with some species involved in the transmission of the causative agents leishmaniasis, bartonellosis, and arbovirus (Figure 1) [3][4][5].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".