Advancements in Aluminum-Based Composite Manufacturing: Leveraging La2O3 Reinforcement through Friction Stir Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the advancements in Aluminum-Based Composite Manufacturing through the incorporation of lanthanum oxide (La2O3) reinforcement using the Friction Stir Process (FSP). The pivotal role of precision machining, particularly the vertical milling machine, in executing FSP is emphasized. Specific parameters, including pin diameter, tool tilt angle, and rotational speed, were meticulously selected to ensure optimal performance. The uniform distribution of La2O3 particles within the composite matrix highlights the effectiveness of the fabrication process, indicating proper mixing and dispersion techniques. Experimental findings reveal significant improvements in mechanical properties, with a notable 22.78% enhancement in tensile strength, a significant 35.21% increase in hardness, a noteworthy 24.44% improvement in fatigue strength, and a substantial 28.68% increase in wear resistance observed in aluminum-La2O3 composites produced via FSP. These results underscore the potential of leveraging FSP for aluminum-based composite manufacturing, offering opportunities for the development of high-performance materials with enhanced mechanical properties and durability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".