Formes et approches d’intermédiations territoriales dans la démarche d’économie circulaire au Kamouraska (Québec)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article examine les mécanismes d’intermédiations dans la démarche d’économie circulaire (EC) dans la municipalité régionale de comté (MRC) de Kamouraska (Québec). L’analyse de données issues de 40 entretiens semi-dirigés interroge le processus de construction et de coordination du réseau socioéconomique local de développement de l’EC. Elle permet de souligner l’importance de la complémentarité des acteurs, les interactions réciproques et collectives, les ressources tangibles et intangibles du territoire, les valeurs et normes dans les intermédiations entre les parties prenantes aux expérimentations locales d’EC. L’analyse renvoie à une réaffirmation de la dimension territoriale et collective de l’EC qui peut être saisie au travers de systèmes de valeurs et de normes, la mobilisation et la coordination de différentes catégories d’acteurs territoriaux (consommateurs, organisations communautaires, associations, etc.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".