MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393326897 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i3.2401

Level Of Aggression Among The Athletes Of High And Low Self-Efficacy

2023· article· en· W4393326897 on OpenAlex
DR. VISHAL SUBHASH PAWAR

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Training Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggressionAthletesPsychologyClinical psychologyPhysical therapyDevelopmental psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Background: According to Scheier and Carver (1992) self-efficacy underlines people‘s faith in their ability to carry out particular behaviour or produce a desired outcome. Self-efficacy is a person‘s belief in his or her ability to complete a future task or solve a future problem. Other hand, aggression is distinct from, synonymously used words like anger and hostility. According to Fraczek and Zumkley (1992), Aggressive behaviour is aimed at causing harm to others. In this study investigator find out the impact of self-efficacy on level of aggression. Objectives: The study objective was, to study the significant difference in level of aggression among the athletes of high and low self-efficacy. Other hind side objective was, to study the significant difference in level of aggression among male and female athletes.       Procedure: The present study, one hundred twenty athletes were selected. Out of them, sixty athletes were selected from high self-efficacy, in which thirty were selected from male athletes and thirty were selected from female athletes as well as in the same way sixty athletes were selected from low self-efficacy, in which thirty were selected from male athletes and thirty were selected from female athletes. The purposive sampling technique was used for the selection the sample. Their age range between was 20 to 26 years. In this study self-efficacy scale has developed by, Dr. A. K. Singh and Dr. Shruti Narain and Aggression Inventory is developed by M.K. Sultania have been used. Conclusions: It is concluded that, there is significant difference found in level of aggression among the high and low self-efficacy athletes. The athletes of low self-efficacy have found more level of aggression than athletes of high self-efficacy. Another concluded that, there is insignificant difference found in level of aggression among the male and female athletes. The male and female athletes have found equal on their level of aggression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.459
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.018 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it