MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393337804 · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01317-7

A framework to assess permafrost thaw threat for land transportation infrastructure in northern Canada

2024· article· en· W4393337804 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ali Fatolahzadeh Gheysari, Pooneh Maghoul

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Earth & Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of Manitoba
FundersMitacs
KeywordsPermafrostTransportation infrastructureLand useEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental planningPhysical geographyGeographyGeologyCivil engineeringTransport engineeringEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Prediction of permafrost stability is associated with challenges, such as data scarcity and climate uncertainties. Here we present a data-driven framework that predicts permafrost thaw threat based on present ground ice distributions and ground surface temperatures predicted via machine learning. The framework uses long short-term memory models, which account for the sequential nature of climate data, and predicts ground surface temperature based on several climate variables from reanalysis products and regional climate models. Permafrost thaw threat is then assessed for three cases in northern Canada: Hudson Bay Railway, Mackenzie Northern Railway, and Inuvik–Tuktoyaktuk Highway. The models predict ground surface warming in all studied areas under both moderate and extreme climate change scenarios. The results also suggest that all studied cases are already under threat, with the northern sections of the Hudson Bay Railway and Inuvik–Tuktoyaktuk Highway facing an increasing threat by the end of the century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications Earth & EnvironmentSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207