MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393341853 · doi:10.2112/jcr-si50-094.1

Investigations into Ship Induced Hydrodynamics and Scour in Confined Shipping Channels

2007· article· en· W4393341853 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth Taylor, K. R. Hall, Neil J. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Coastal Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMarine engineeringOceanographyBeach morphodynamicsSediment transportEngineeringGeomorphologySediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taylor D, Hall K and Macdonald N, J., 2007. Investigations into ship induced hydrodynamics and scour in confined shipping channels. Journal of Coastal Research, SI 50 (Proceedings of the 9th International Coastal Symposium), 491 – 496. Gold Coast, Australia, ISSN 0749.0208 Deep draft ships transiting through confined channels can significantly alter surrounding hydrodynamic conditions. Drawdown is a long-period motion, in the order of 30 to 150s, caused by the ship displacing water from the channel. The long-period character of the drawdown wave causes relatively large near-bed currents which are capable of inducing significant rates of sediment transport. The Burlington Shipping Channel is a confined channel, 88m wide and 800m long, which connects Hamilton Harbour to Lake Ontario. Significant scour levels have been observed near the entrances to the channel and along the nearby sheet-pile channel piers. A series of investigations have been undertaken to determine the extent of scour and the magnitude of the forces causing scour. Investigations discussed in this paper include bathymetric and hydrodynamic data collection and numerical modelling using the ship wake and drawdown model SGH (Ship-Generated Hydrodynamics). Hydrodynamic data was collected for seven ship movements to investigate hydrodynamic forces contributing to the scour. The applicability of simulating drawdown using a two-dimensional depth-averaged ship drawdown model such as SGH has been investigated. The model achieved a good level of calibration, particularly in the mid-sections of the channel and near the western entrance. The investigations have confirmed the validity of using sophisticated ship models such as SGH to investigate complex hydrodynamic and scour processes associated with deep draft ships transiting through confined channels. These models are capable of realistically simulating the spatial variation in sediment transport potential in confined channels and could be used to assist in the design of appropriate channel protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Coastal ResearchSame topicFluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207