MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393341987 · doi:10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4543

The Codification of Civil Law in Quebec: An Example for Vietnam?

2024· article· en· W4393341987 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sébastien Lafrance

Bibliographic record

VenueVNU Journal of Science Legal Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawPolitical scienceCivil law (Civil law)Commercial law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Quebec legal system is one of the few hybrid legal systems of the world that combines both common law and civil law. While the civil law regime in Quebec is mainly inspired by the Napoleon Code, the Civil Code of France, it still remains being influenced by the common law system, for example for its extensive reliance on jurisprudence. As it is the case for Quebec, the French Civil Code has also been heavily influential on the codification of the Vietnam’s Civil Code. Vietnam’s use of legal transplants also shows the impact of other legal systems on its own. In this paper, the author aims to brush an overview of the Quebec civil law codification that includes some comparisons with the Vietnam civil law regime.
 
 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVNU Journal of Science Legal StudiesSame topicLegal and Social PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207