Synergy in bio-inspired hybrid composites with hierarchically structured fibrous reinforcements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to the global energy crisis, high-performance transportation sectors are rapidly embracing lightweight materials to enhance energy efficiency and sustainability, while grappling with the persistent challenges of developing structural materials that meet stringent safety standards with robust mechanical performance and ease of scalability. Thus, this work presents a combined experimental and theoretical framework to develop a profound understanding of the synergistic effect in hybrid composites with bio-inspired fibrous reinforcements, by elucidating the interfacial interactions across multiple length-scales, encompassing atomic covalent bonding to micro-morphology. A model hybrid composite system, containing a self-assembled fibrous reinforcement consisting of nano-sized Graphene Nanoplatelets (GnP) covalently bonded onto chemically-modified micro-sized Glass Fibers (GF), was utilized to showcase the synergistic effect and highlight its associated mechanisms. The interfacial interactions of the reinforcement were optimized by obtaining the maximum density of covalent bonds, which was achieved with 0.5 wt% GnP for the hybrid composites containing 10 wt% GF, increasing the work of adhesion by 33 %, compared to the biphasic GF composites. The composite’s morphology contains minimal agglomeration with ∼68 % of GnPs oriented with the melt flow, supressing high-stress concentration areas, while the formed crystalline microstructure, with ∼18 % β-crystals, allows the matrix to absorb substantial energy. Furthermore, the increased trans-crystallization encapsulating the hierarchical reinforcement induced nanoscale stiffness variations, increasing rigidity, and forming an ∼16 µm gradient interphase that facilitates load transfer. The greatest synergistic effect observed was ∼54 %, ∼37 %, and ∼75 % for the tensile modulus, tensile strength, and impact strength, respectively. Additionally, a theoretical framework accounting for the synergistic effect was formulated, using a two-step core/shell homogenization model, which shows great potential in expediting the design and optimization of innovative hybrid composite materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".