MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393356128 · doi:10.1079/tourism.2024.0036

Experiencing Exclusion among Iranian-Canadian Muslim Women

2024· article· en· W4393356128 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohadeseh Mahmoudi

Bibliographic record

VenueTourism Cases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicUrban Agriculture and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGender studiesPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This case study includes three narratives of Iranian-Canadian Muslim women who describe their experience of visiting natural spaces in Canada. They wear Islamic hijabs and follow Islamic rules, which may cause them to experience natural spaces differently compared to other Canadians. These narratives resulted from a series of interviews I conducted in which I aimed to understand how Iranian Canadians used Canada’s natural environment and the opportunities or challenges they face. Their stories revealed their joy in nature-based leisure and recreation while also unfolding their feelings of social exclusion in some natural settings where dogs were off-leash. In dogs’ off-leash areas, participants encountered serious constraints and exclusion or felt in need of protection from spouses. Information © CAB International 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTourism CasesSame topicUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207