Pengembangan Media Gambar Kartun dari Kulit Jagung untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Tema 8 Subtema 3 Kelas II Sekolah Dasar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan sebuah media pembelajaran yaitu media gambar kartun dari kulit jagung untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa tema 8 subtema 3 kelas II SDN 2 Badrain yang valid, praktis, dan efektif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah model pengembangan ADDIE yaitu (1) Analysis, (2) Design, (3) Development, (4) Implementation, (5) Evaluation. Untuk tahap uji coba terbatas dilaksanakan di kelas II SDN 2 Badrain dan tahap uji coba lapangan dilaksanakan di kelas II SDN 1 Badrain. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa produk pengembangan media gambar kartun dari kulit jagung ini mendapat nilai rata-rata hasil validasi ahli media 0,77% (valid), ahli materi 0,84% (sangat valid). Adapun hasil dari uji coba terbatas mendapat nilai rata-rata 82,4% dikategorikan (praktis), sedangkan hasil dari uji coba lapangan memperoleh skor N-Gain 80,87% dan dikategorikan (sangat efektif). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pengembangan media gambar kartun dari kulit jagung untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa ini dinyatakan valid, praktis, dan efektif serta layak digunakan pada pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar. Kata Kunci: Media Gambar Kartun Dari Kulit Jagung, Hasil Belajar, Research and Development (R&D).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".