The six-spotted spider mite, Eotetranychus sexmaculatus (Riley) (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) in Australia, New Zealand, Japan and USA: a revised morphological and molecular-based concept, synonyms, and related species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on morphological and molecular evidence, Eotetranychus asiaticus Ehara is confirmed as a junior synonym of E. sexmaculatus (Riley). Eotetranychus queenslandicus Manson differs to E. sexmaculatus in some morphological characters states, and currently there is insufficient evidence to confirm if it is also a junior synonym. We therefore propose that it remains a valid species until fresh material can be collected from the type host (Codiaeum variegatum (L.) A.Juss.; Euphorbiaceae) in the type location (Freshwater, Queensland, Australia) for molecular analysis and further comparisons. Eotetranychus sexmaculatus is confirmed as present in Australia and New Zealand. Our analyses indicate that specimens identified as E. sexmaculatus from avocado (Persea americana Mill.; Lauraceae) in Western Australia and New Zealand, and specimens of E. asiaticus from the type host (Ficus erecta Thunb.; Moraceae) and type location (Tomigusuku, Okinawa, Japan) are conspecific with specimens of E. sexmaculatus recently collected from the type host (Citrus sp.; Rutaceae) and type location (Florida, USA), with 0-3.6% divergence in a fragment (451 bp) of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI), and 0-0.3% in the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer II (ITS2) gene. Herein we redefine E. sexmaculatus, providing a revised diagnosis, notes on leg chaetotaxy, and variation in the shape of the aedeagus-which is a keystone feature critical for determining species boundaries of spider mite species that have males. Our findings also reinforce the potential of the eupathidion on the palptarsus suζ (i.e. the spinneret) for species diagnoses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".