MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393377137 · doi:10.1029/2022je007731

Water and Chlorine in the Martian Subsurface Along the 27 km Traverse of NASA's Curiosity Rover According to DAN Measurements: 2. Results for Distinct Geological Regions

2024· article· en· W4393377137 on OpenAlexaff
S. Nikiforov, M. V. Djachkova, R. Gellert, И. Г. Митрофанов, Denis Lisov, M. L. Litvak, А. Б. Санин, A. R. Vasavada

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Planets · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsTraverseMartianAstrobiologyGeologyMars Exploration ProgramEarth scienceRemote sensingGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is Part II of a double‐paper series that presents the abundance of water and chlorine along with other neutron‐absorbing elements in the shallow subsurface of Gale crater based on measurements by the Dynamic Albedo of Neutron (DAN) instrument onboard NASA's Curiosity rover. Initial results were represented as pixels on map data products from both DAN active and passive measurements made along the 27‐km traverse of the rover, corresponding to the mission period from landing on the martian surface in August 2012 through December 2021. In Part II, the contents of water and chlorine along with other neutron absorbers are studied separately for distinct geological regions along the traverse. Mean values and sample variances of these values are presented for each region. Water‐equivalent hydrogen (WEH) measurements show variability within the Jura member of the Murray formation and increase within the Carolyn Shoemaker formation. A large fraction of stratigraphic units (e.g., Bradbury, Sheepbed, Pahrump Hills and others) have mean WEH values between 2 and 3 wt.%, while units in the second part of the traverse (Jura, Knockfarrill Hill, Glasgow, Pontours) have mean values of WEH above 3 wt.%. The mean absorption‐equivalent chlorine value has no large variations for all tested geologic units; it is equal to around 1% for all of them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research PlanetsSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207