MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393385764 · doi:10.18103/mra.v12i3.5206

Using Structural Equation Modeling to Investigate the Neural Basis of Altered Pain Processing in Fibromyalgia with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2024· article· en· W4393385764 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Research Archives · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsFibromyalgiaFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingBasis (linear algebra)Structural equation modelingFibromyalgia syndromeNeuroscienceMedicinePsychologyNuclear magnetic resonanceComputer sciencePhysicsPhysical therapyRadiologyMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Participants with fibromyalgia (FM) and healthy controls (HC) experienced an identical ‘threat/safety’ experimental pain paradigm while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the differences in pain processing between the two groups. In the ‘threat’ (Pain) imaging runs, participants were told that they would receive noxious heat stimuli to their right hands, calibrated to elicit subjectively moderate levels of pain. In the ‘safety’ (No-Pain) imaging runs, no stimulus was given. This design enabled the study of both continuous and reactive components of pain processing, as well as brain activity associated with anticipation and reward. The fMRI data were analyzed with a data-driven structural equation modeling approach, and significant group-level connectivity differences were identified in both study conditions, in both time periods of interest (Expectation, Stimulation). Group-level connectivity differences in the No-Pain condition occurred mainly during the expectation of pain, and involved regions associated with emotion and reward, suggesting FM may involve altered affective/reward processing. Group-level connectivity differences in the Pain condition occurred mainly during stimulation, with the FM group having decreased connectivity between the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the amygdala, and increased connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the thalamus. The decreased ACC→Amygdala connectivity supports previous findings, suggesting FM likely involves altered responses in motivational-affective aspects of pain processing. The increased PCC→Thalamus connectivity may suggest the FM group experienced heightened saliency toward the noxious stimuli, which may contribute toward the mechanism which causes hyperalgesia in FM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it