MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393386102 · doi:10.1101/2024.03.31.24304818

Repetitive subconcussion results in disrupted neural activity independent of concussion history

2024· preprint· en· W4393386102 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin Grant Solar, Matthew Ventresca, Rouzbeh Zamyadi, Jing Zhang, Oshin Vartanian, Shawn G. Rhind, Benjamin T. Dunkley

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDefence Research and Development CanadaSickKids FoundationMental Health Research Canada
FundersMinistère de la Défense NationaleCanadian Armed Forces
KeywordsConcussionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeurosciencePsychologyMedicineInjury preventionMedical emergencyPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Concussion is a public health crisis which results in a complex cascade of neurochemical changes in the brain that can have life changing consequences. Subconcussions are considered less serious and were overlooked until recently, but we now realise repetitive subconcussions, such as repetitive head impacts, can lead to serious neurological deficits. Subconcussions are common in contact sports, and the military where certain personnel are exposed to repetitive occupational blast overpressure. Postmortem studies in athletes reveal that cumulative duration of play and force from collisions are better predictors than concussion history for the presence and severity of chronic traumatic encephalopathy – a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative tauopathy, distinct from concussion, thought to be caused by repetitive head impacts, and only diagnosable postmortem – thus, an in vivo predictive biomarker would be game changing. Magnetoencephalography has exceptional temporal sampling for imaging the dynamics of neuronal electrochemical action, and functional MRI shows that functional connectivity is associated with tauopathy patterns. Therefore, both imaging modalities could provide a surrogate biomarker of tauopathy. In this cross-sectional study, we examined the effects of repetitive subconcussion on neuronal activity and functional connectivity using magnetoencephalography and functional MRI, and on neurological symptoms and mental health in a military sample. For magnetoencephalography and outcome analyses, 81 participants were split into ‘high’ and ‘low’ blast exposure groups using the generalized blast exposure value: n =41 high blast (26.4–65.7 years; 4 females); n =40 low blast (28.0–63.3 years; 8 females). For fMRI, two high blast male participants without data were excluded: n =39 (29.6–65.7 years). Magnetoencephalography revealed disrupted neuronal activity in participants with a greater history of repetitive subconcussions, including: neural slowing (excessive delta activity) in the right frontal and temporal lobes and subcortical regions (hippocampus, amygdala, caudate, pallidum, thalamus), and functional dysconnectivity in the posterior default mode network (low and high gamma). Notably, these irregularities were independent of concussion or traumatic stress history, and magnetoencephalography revealed functional dysconnectivity not detected with functional MRI. Besides regional slowing and functional disconnection in crucial brain hubs, those with greater blast exposure had poorer neurological outcomes in somatic and cognitive domains, with no blast-related differences in mental health and no associations between neurological symptoms and neuronal activity. This study suggests that repetitive subconcussions have insidious effects on the brain and that magnetoencephalography provides a potential avenue for both treatment targets by identifying affected brain regions and in prevention by identifying those at risk of cumulative subconcussive neurotrauma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→