Exploring the Aesthetic Values Of Finger Millet- Ragi (Eleusine Coracana L): A Multifaceted Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ragi, or finger millet (Eleusine coracana), is an ancient cereal grain that has been farmed for thousands of years, mostly in Asia and Africa. It is a staple food in many areas due to its well-known nutritional value and health advantages. Finger millet has been increasingly popular across the globe in recent times owing to its remarkable nutritional content and adaptability in culinary uses. With a focus on finger millet's antioxidant qualities, health advantages, and culinary applications, this thorough assessment offers a detailed analysis of the grain's nutritional makeup. Among the small millets, ragi, commonly referred to as finger millet (Eleusine coracana), is one of the most significant grains and is cultivated over the largest area. In terms of protein (6–8%) and fat (1-2%), finger millet is similar to rice. However, it has higher mineral and micronutrient levels than both rice and wheat. It provides a primary source of dietary carbs for a significant portion of the population. In addition to the main food components, ragi provides many health advantages and is a rich source of important micronutrients. The present demand for the well-being of society is to develop value-added food items based on ragi that can enhance nutritional value and be favorable for good health. This paper attempts a comprehensive review to explore the nutritional composition of finger millet, highlighting its macronutrient and micronutrient content, antioxidant properties, health benefits, and culinary applications. The review also discusses the importance of finger millet in promoting overall health and well-being, making it a valuable addition to a balanced diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".