MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393391080 · doi:10.1101/2024.03.29.587330

fMROI: a simple and adaptable toolbox for easy region-of-interest creation

2024· preprint· en· W4393391080 on OpenAlexaff
André Salles Cunha Peres, Daniela Valério, Igor Vaz, Morteza Mahdiani, Jon Walbrin, Jorge Almeida

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaResearch Executive AgencyHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeEuropean Commission
KeywordsToolboxSimple (philosophy)Computer scienceProgramming languageEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study introduces fMROI, an open-source software designed for creating regions-of-interest (ROIs) and visualizing magnetic resonance imaging data. fMROI offers a user-friendly graphical interface that simplifies the creation of complex ROIs. It is compatible with various operating systems and enables the integration of user-specified algorithms. Comparative analysis against popular neuroimaging software demonstrates the feasibility, applicability, and ease of use of fMROI. Notably, fMROI’s interactive graphical interface with a real-time viewer allows users to identify inconsistencies and design more accurate ROIs, saving significant time by avoiding errors before storing ROIs as NIfTI files. Additionally, fMROI supports automation through command-line accessibility, making it ideal for large-scale analyses. As an open-source platform, fMROI provides a valuable resource for researchers in the neuroimaging community, facilitating efficient ROI creation and streamlining neuroimage analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207