Accurate Prediction of Network Distance via Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large number of distributed applications necessitate accurate network distance, for example, in the form of delay or latency, to ensure the Quality of Service (QoS). Due to high network measurement overhead and severe traffic congestion, network distance prediction has been introduced, instead of direct network measurements, to infer the unknown network distance with the partial measurements. However, most existing efforts neglect to fully capitalize on the potential latent factors, such as spatial correlations, long-existing temporal results and multi-rule exploration fusion, to achieve better accuracies with quicker convergence. To fill this gap, in this paper, we propose an Accurate Prediction of Network Distance (APND) solution via Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning (FDRL), which has four novel features distinguishing from the previous work. Firstly, a local feature-based matrix with low rank is established in each network cluster, referring to a set of neighbor nodes, to represent the potential spatial correlations among reachable node-pairs. Secondly, the parallel FDRL-based matrix factorization with multi-rule exploration fusion is introduced into APND and executed in all local clusters to minimize prediction errors and accelerate learning convergence. Thirdly, the long-existing learning experience is designed for local model training via Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) with rapid convergence. Fourthly, following the real-world routing paths, the cross-domain network nodes are simultaneously classified into adjacent clusters, built on the spatial correlations among them, and their coordinates will be further refined with error-based and average-based policies. Extensive experiments built on available real-world datasets illustrate that APND can accurately predict network distance compared with state-of-the-art approaches at the moderate computing cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".