MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393405525 · doi:10.4000/litteratures.3336

Perception, entendement et contresens de l’image dans la Vallée d’Obermann de Liszt face aux paysages grecs de Carl Rottmann : approche phénoménologique de la première Année de pèlerinage

2021· article· fr· W4393405525 on OpenAlex
Nicolas Dufetel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLittératures · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans l’avant-propos de l’Album d’un voyageur, préfiguration de la première Année de pèlerinage (Suisse), Liszt écrit avoir « essayé de rendre en musique quelques-unes de [s]es sensations les plus fortes, de [s]es plus vives perceptions » face à la nature. Nous proposons d’utiliser le cadre de la phénoménologie hégélienne pour étudier le rôle des paysages qui l’ont inspiré, mais aussi les illustrations de la première édition. Liszt déclare en être satisfait, sauf de celle pour Vallée d’Obermann qu’il considère comme un « contresens ». L’œuvre n’est en effet pas liée à la géographie, mais à Obermann de Senancour, dont il cite un extrait dans la partition (avec des vers de Byron). Il décrit aussi le « paysage funèbre désolé » qui conviendrait à la pièce et donne en exemple les paysages grecs de Carl Rotmann.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it