MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393408844 · doi:10.1016/j.sab.2024.106911

Detection and diagnosis of bacterial pathogens in blood using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

2024· article· en· W4393408844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLaser-induced breakdown spectroscopyBacteriaChromatographyPseudomonas aeruginosaPartial least squares regressionEnterobacter cloacaePathogenic bacteriaMicrobiologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Blood cultureStaphylococcus aureusLinear discriminant analysisSpectroscopyMaterials scienceChemistryEscherichia coliBiologyEnterobacteriaceaeAntibioticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to rapidly and accurately detect and identify pathogenic bacteria in clinically-obtained blood specimens with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is evaluated. Samples of blood obtained from five patients in a local hospital were confirmed to be negative for the presence of bacteria by the pathology department and were then tested with LIBS. Specimens of blood were tested as obtained from the hospital with no other alteration as control samples and were also intentionally spiked with known aliquots of Escherichia coli , Staphylococcus aureus , Enterobacter cloacae , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to simulate blood infections . LIBS spectra were acquired from blood deposited on nitrocellulose filters. The intensities of 15 emission lines measured in the spectra and 92 ratios of those line intensities were used as 107 independent variables in a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to discriminate between sterile control samples and those spiked with bacteria. In addition, the entire LIBS spectrum from 200 nm – 590 nm was input into an artificial neural network analysis with principal component analysis pre-processing (PCA-ANN) to diagnose the bacterial species once detected. The PLS-DA test possessed a 96.3% sensitivity and a 98.6% specificity for the detection of pathogenic bacteria in blood when 776 spectra from 26 filters were tested by removing one entire filter at a time from the model and testing each spectrum individually. When all the spectra obtained from a filter were averaged to enhance the signal to noise of the spectrum, 19 of 19 filters of infected blood tested positive and 7 of 7 filters with sterile blood tested negative, yielding 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PCA-ANN test performed on the entire LIBS spectrum possessed a 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when using 80% of the data to build a model and withholding 20% for cross-validation testing. The same PCA-ANN performed on each of the 19 filters individually, using the other 18 filters to build the model, possessed an average sensitivity of 85.5%, an average specificity of 95.0%, and a classification accuracy of 92.5%. These results indicate the potential usefulness of LIBS for detecting and diagnosing blood infections in a clinical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it