Detection and diagnosis of bacterial pathogens in blood using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The ability to rapidly and accurately detect and identify pathogenic bacteria in clinically-obtained blood specimens with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is evaluated. Samples of blood obtained from five patients in a local hospital were confirmed to be negative for the presence of bacteria by the pathology department and were then tested with LIBS. Specimens of blood were tested as obtained from the hospital with no other alteration as control samples and were also intentionally spiked with known aliquots of Escherichia coli , Staphylococcus aureus , Enterobacter cloacae , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to simulate blood infections . LIBS spectra were acquired from blood deposited on nitrocellulose filters. The intensities of 15 emission lines measured in the spectra and 92 ratios of those line intensities were used as 107 independent variables in a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to discriminate between sterile control samples and those spiked with bacteria. In addition, the entire LIBS spectrum from 200 nm – 590 nm was input into an artificial neural network analysis with principal component analysis pre-processing (PCA-ANN) to diagnose the bacterial species once detected. The PLS-DA test possessed a 96.3% sensitivity and a 98.6% specificity for the detection of pathogenic bacteria in blood when 776 spectra from 26 filters were tested by removing one entire filter at a time from the model and testing each spectrum individually. When all the spectra obtained from a filter were averaged to enhance the signal to noise of the spectrum, 19 of 19 filters of infected blood tested positive and 7 of 7 filters with sterile blood tested negative, yielding 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The PCA-ANN test performed on the entire LIBS spectrum possessed a 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when using 80% of the data to build a model and withholding 20% for cross-validation testing. The same PCA-ANN performed on each of the 19 filters individually, using the other 18 filters to build the model, possessed an average sensitivity of 85.5%, an average specificity of 95.0%, and a classification accuracy of 92.5%. These results indicate the potential usefulness of LIBS for detecting and diagnosing blood infections in a clinical setting.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle