Genome-wide association study of glucocerebrosidase activity modifiers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract One of the most common genetic risk factors for Parkinson’s disease (PD) are variants in GBA1 , which encodes the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GCase). GCase deficiency has been associated with an increased PD risk, but not all individuals with low GCase activity are carriers of GBA1 mutations, suggesting other factors may be acting as modifiers. We aimed to discover common variants associated with GCase activity, as well as replicate previously reported associations, by performing a genome-wide association study using two independent cohorts: a Columbia University cohort consisting of 697 PD cases and 347 controls and the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort consisting of 357 PD cases and 163 controls. As expected, GBA1 variants have the strongest association with decreased activity, led by p.N370S (beta = -4.36, se = 0.32, p = 5.05e-43). We also identify a novel association in the GAA locus (encoding for acid alpha-glucosidase, beta = -0.96, se = 0.17, p = 5.23e-09) that may be the result of an interaction between GCase and acid alpha-glucosidase based on various interaction analyses. Lastly, we show that several PD-risk loci are potentially associated with GCase activity. Further research will be needed to replicate and validate our findings and to uncover the functional connection between acid alpha-glucosidase and GCase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".