MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393416299 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.56354

Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Data from 41PT283 in Potter County, Texas

2016· dataset· en· W4393416299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFM-OAR (INFN Catania) · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround-penetrating radarGeologyRemote sensingRadarArchaeologyGeographyEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On June 16, 2016, a ground-penetrating radar (GPR) survey was conducted at an Antelope Creek site (41PT283) on the Bureau of Land Management's Cross Bar Management Area in Potter County, Texas. These data represent raw, unprocessed data collected along the X-axis of a 13m (X-axis) x14m (Y-axis) grid at 50cm intervals. This survey is linked to an existing grid from previous investigations at the site in 2007 and 2008. These data will serve as a comparative reference for additional GPR surveys in the area of the Canadian River basin, can be used as an educational dataset to teach GPR processing techniques, and is representative of one of the first GPR surveys at an archaeological site in the Texas panhandle. This dataset includes 29 transects and an illustrated grid. Many thanks to Ryan Howell, Adrian Escobar, and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for requisite permissions and access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it