Cell-Cell Interaction Database
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Overview This page describes the automated construction of a cell-cell interaction database by filtering existing curated protein-protein interaction (PPI) data. Cell-cell interactions are important for understanding tissue organization. We and others have built cell-cell interaction databases (1-5). The resource available from this website represents an automatically built set of protein-protein interactions that can mediate cell-cell communication that is expanded compared to previous databases we have built. Receptors Receptor genes were defined based on the union of the annotations from the set of Gene Ontology (GO) terms (6,7): GO:0043235 - receptor complex, GO:0008305 - integrin complex, GO:0072657 - protein localized to membrane GO:0043113 - receptor clustering GO:0004872 - receptor activity, GO:0009897 - external side of plasma membrane) UniProt annotations search term -"Receptor [KW-0675]" go:0005886 organism:human. This created a set of 4364 receptor genes (prior to manual curation) Ligands Ligand genes were defined based on the union of the below annotations the GO terms (6,7): GO:0005102 - receptor binding the set of proteins labelled as secreted in the Secretome dataset (http://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/secretome) (8). This created a set of 3209 Ligand genes (prior to manual curation) Extracellular Matrix Extracellular Matrix (ECM) genes were defined based on the union of the annotations from the GO terms (6,7): GO:0031012 - extracellular matrix GO:0005578 - proteinacious extracellular matrix GO:0005201 - extracellular matrix structural constituent GO:1990430 - extracellular matrix protein binding GO:0035426 - extracellular matrix cell signalling This created a set of 433 ECM genes (prior to manual curation) Manual Curation ECM, Receptor and ligand lists were manually curated genes that were neither receptors or ligands were removed misclassified genes were moved to the correct list (i.e. receptors found on the ligand list or vice versa) After curation, the resulting ligand, receptor and ECM sets consisted of: Receptors - 1851 genes Ligands - 1593 genes ECM - 433 genes In each of the above sets there are genes that are part of other sets (e.g. a gene can be ECM and ligand at the same time) Interaction Data The set of protein interactions were downloaded from: iRefIndex (version 14) (9). - all BioGRID interactions were excluded from the iRefIndex set as we imported the original source. Pathway Commons (version 8) (10). BioGRID (version 3.4.147) (11). The entire interaction set was filtered to only include interactions that contained receptor-ligand, receptor-receptor, ligand-ligand, receptor-ecm, ligand-ecm or ecm-ecm interactions where the receptor, ligands and ecm were defined by the above lists. The resulting Receptor-Ligand network contained 2,593 unique proteins and 38,446 unique interactions (115,900 interaction total) Data files ligands.txt - table of ligands. (contains HGNC symbol and classification (Ligand, Ligand/ECM, Ligand/Receptor, Ligand/ECM/Receptor) receptors.txt - table of receptors. (contains HGNC symbol and classification (Receptor, Receptor/ECM, Ligand/Receptor, Ligand/ECM/Receptor) ecm.txt - table of ECM. (contains HGNC symbol and classification (ECM, ECM/Receptor, ECM/Ligand, Ligand/ECM/Receptor) protein_types.txt - table of unique set of receptor, ligand and ECM genes (all of the above tables: contains HGNC symbol as well as classification (Receptor, Ligand, ECM, ECM/Receptor, ECM/Ligand, Receptor/Ligand, Ligand/ECM/Receptor) receptor_ligand_interactions_mitab_v1.0_April2017.txt(.zip/.gz) - tab delimited file in mitab 2.5 format containing the following columns: AliasA - main Alias for molecule A (often the recognized gene symbol) AliasB- main Alias for molecule B (often the recognized gene symbol) uidA - unique identifier for molecule A (depending on the source database this can be one of the following types uniprot, refseq, entrez gene id, ensembl) uidB - unique identifier for molecule A (depending on the source database this can be one of the following types uniprot, refseq, entrez gene id, ensembl) altA - list of alternate identifiers for molecule A. altB - list of alternate identifiers for molecule B. aliasA - list of alternate aliases for molecule A. aliasB - list of alternate aliases for molecule B. method - list of psi-mi terms indicating experimental methods used to discover interaction. author - text listing authors pmids - list of pmids associated with the interaction. taxa - taxon id for molecule A. taxb - taxon id for molecule B. interactionType - list of psi-mi terms indicating the type of interactions it is. sourcedb - source database. interactionIdentifier - source database interaction identifier confidence - confidence of interaction as supplied by database source References Qiao W, Wang W, Laurenti E, Turinsky AL, Wodak SJ, Bader GD, Dick JE, Zandstra PW Intercellular network structure and regulatory motifs in the human hematopoietic system Pubmed Kirouac DC, Ito C, Csaszar E, Roch A, Yu M, Sykes EA, Bader GD, Zandstra PW. Dynamic interaction networks in a hierarchically organized tissue. Mol Syst Biol. 2010 Oct 5;6:417 Pubmed Yuzwa SA, Yang G, Borrett MJ, Clarke G, Cancino GI, Zahr SK, Zandstra PW, Kaplan DR, Miller FD. Proneurogenic Ligands Defined by Modeling Developing Cortex Growth Factor Communication Networks. Neuron. 2016 Sep 7;91(5):988-1004 Pubmed Ramilowski JA, Goldberg T, Harshbarger J, Kloppmann E, Lizio M, Satagopam VP, Itoh M, Kawaji H, Carninci P, Rost B, Forrest AR. A draft network of ligand-receptor-mediated multicellular signalling in human. Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 22;6:7866. Pubmed Rieckmann JC, Geiger R, Hornburg D, Wolf T, Kveler K, Jarrossay D, Sallusto F, Shen-Orr SS, Lanzavecchia A, Mann M, Meissner F. Social network architecture of human immune cells unveiled by quantitative proteomics. Nat Immunol. 2017 May;18(5):583-593. PMID: 28263321. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9 Pubmed The Gene Ontology Consortium. Expansion of the Gene Ontology knowledgebase and resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D331-D338 Pubmed Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson Å, Kampf C, Sjöstedt E, Asplund A, Olsson I, Edlund K, Lundberg E, Navani S, Szigyarto CA, Odeberg J, Djureinovic D, Takanen JO, Hober S, Alm T, Edqvist PH, Berling H, Tegel H, Mulder J, Rockberg J, Nilsson P, Schwenk JM, Hamsten M, von Feilitzen K, Forsberg M, Persson L, Johansson F, Zwahlen M, von Heijne G, Nielsen J, Pontén F. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220) Pubmed Razick S, Magklaras G, Donaldson IM. iRefIndex: a consolidated protein interaction database with provenance. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 30;9:405 Pubmed Cerami EG, Gross BE, Demir E, Rodchenkov I, Babur O, Anwar N, Schultz N, Bader GD, Sander C. Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D685-90.2010 Nov 10. Pubmed Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D535-9. Pubmed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.130 | 0.132 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".