MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393424140 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3246544

Ichtyological data of Station de biologie des Laurentides

2019· dataset· en· W4393424140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emmanuelle Chrétien, Maxime Leclerc

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These data combine fish sampling, basic physical variables, and macroinvertebrate data collected in main water bodies of Station de biologie des Laurentides (SBL) during BIO2476 field course in September 2018. BIO2476 is an undergrad course in the Department of biological sciences of Université de Montréal. During the field course, students sample fish in main SBL waterbodies using different capture techniques (e.g. electrofishing, minnow traps, fyke nets) and visual observation (snorkeling surveys). Fish counts obtained by these different techniques can be expressed as relative abundances using sampling gear dimensions, duration of sampling and/or water volume covered by sampling gear. Data are collected by participating students using standardized and documented methods under the supervision of HQP (teaching assistants and course lecturer). These data are used by students to compute different ichtyological metrics and write their final report. These data consist mainly in datatables accessible openly but fish scale samples and fish photos are also available upon request.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→