Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amniota is a tetrapod group that was recognized originally in the 19th century on the basis of developmental features (extra-embryonic membranes), but since the widespread adoption of phylogenetic systematics in the late 20th century, it has been recast as a crown clade. The oldest amniotes are Late Carboniferous in age (ca. 318 million years ago), and they are preserved in coal beds and lycopod tree stumps that have yielded rich faunas of temnospondyls, anthracosaurs, and other early tetrapods. Numerous phylogenetic studies of the past three decades have focused on the relationships of amniotes to other early tetrapods, resulting in the prevailing picture that Amniota is the crown of a total group with many extinct Paleozoic clades comprising its stem group. The content and the sequence of branching among stem amniotes are vigorously debated topics in early tetrapod paleontology. The ‘traditional’ stem amniote group Diadectomorpha has been proposed as the sister group of synapsid amniotes in a series of papers by one research group. If correct, the placement of Diadectomorpha within Amniota implies that high-fiber herbivory, a key component of terrestrial vertebrate ecosystems of modern aspect, is an entirely amniote phenomenon. Another stem group, Recumbirostra, has been recovered by other researchers within Amniota as reptiles. Recumbirostrans exhibit cranial features that are correlated with a fossorial lifestyle, and most species for which we have postcrania reveal the phenomena of body elongation and many of these exhibit limb reduction. If correct, the identification of recumbirostrans as early reptiles not only greatly augments the content of Paleozoic Amniota but also marks the evolution of skeletal features indicative of a burrowing lifestyle that predates the appearance of unequivocal fossorial amniotes (cistecephalid dicynodonts) by 40 million years. However, it is premature to accept either diadectomorphs or recumbirostrans as amniotes, given issues with scorings for amniote taxa, character argumentation, and poor homologization of braincase features between amniote and anamniote taxa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".