Generalized Hukuhara Dini Hadamard $\epsilon$-subdifferential and $H_{\epsilon}$-subgradient and their applications in interval optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we develop and analyze the concepts of gH-Dini Hadamard ε-subdifferential and H ε -subgradient for interval-valued functions (IVFs).Some important characteristics of gH-Dini Hadamard ε-subdifferential such as closedness, convexity, and monotonicity are studied.The interrelations between gH-subgradient and gH-Dini Hadamard ε-subgradient, and between gH-Fréchet derivative and gH-Dini Hadamard ε-subdifferential are investigated.To define the concept of H ε -subgradient, the notions of the sponge of a set around a point and gH-calm IVF at a point are studied.A variational description of gH-Dini Hadamard ε-subgradient with H ε -subgradient is proposed.Various necessary and sufficient conditions for obtaining an ε-efficient solution to an interval optimization problem (IOP) with the help of gH-Dini Hadamard ε-subgradient of an IVF are derived.Lastly, an application of proposed results is discussed in the sparsity regularizer for IOPs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it