Austenite formation in a medium-Mn steel during intercritical annealing via in situ high-energy X-ray diffraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microstructural evolution of a prototype Fe-0.15C-5.56Mn-1.1Si-1.89Al medium-Mn third-generation advanced high strength steel (3G AHSS) with a martensite-ferrite (MF) starting microstructure during intercritical annealing was determined in situ using high energy X-ray diffraction (HEXRD). Intercritical annealing was carried out at 665 °C and 710 °C for 120 s and 240 s, followed by cooling to room temperature. HEXRD data were analyzed to monitor the austenite fraction and lattice parameters throughout the thermal cycle. During isothermal holding, the austenite fraction increased, up to 31% and 45% for the samples annealed for 120 s, and up to 33% and 46% for the samples annealed for 240 s at 665 °C and 710 °C, respectively. Observed changes in lattice parameters during isothermal holding were attributed to composition changes due to the partitioning of C between austenite and ferrite. Diffusion simulations using DICTRA were used to calculate solute partitioning during intercritical annealing, providing further insights into both austenite growth and the distribution of alloying elements within the austenite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".