Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aussi appelé inclinomètre, le clinomètre sert à mesurer les angles sur terre. Les renseignements obtenus peuvent être utilisés pour déterminer, par exemple, l'hauteur d'un objet. Le clinomètre existe depuis très longtemps. Au début, il s'agissait d'un simple fil à plomb. Vers la fin du 18e siècle, il était devenu un instrument plus complexe, qui se composait notamment de niveaux à bulle et de télescopes. Le clinomètre illustré a été conçu et utilisé par le Service météorologique du Canada pour déterminer l'altitude de la base des nuages du début des années 1950 jusqu'en 1958. Remarque : Ce modèle est conçu pour être visualisé dans un environnement virtuel au moyen d'un logiciel. Pour fabriquer votre propre manipulateur télégraphique, visitez le site ingeniumcanada.org/fr/education/clinometre-3D Vous trouverez nos conditions d'utilisation [ici](https://ingeniumcanada.org/ingenium/doc/content/cstmc/CSTMC%20terms%20of%20use%203D%20FR.pdf). Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".