MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393501355 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7528001

A Daily High-Resolution (1 km) Human Thermal Index Collection over the North China Plain from 2003 to 2020

2023· dataset· en· W4393501355 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Li, Ming Luo, Yongquan Zhao, Erjia Ge, Hui Zhang, Ziwei Huang, Sijia Wu, Peng Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Yu Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)ChinaGeographyHigh resolutionEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyRemote sensingArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The daily High spatial resolution human Thermal Index Collection over the North China Plain (HiTIC-NCP) includes near-surface air temperature (SAT) and 11 commonly used human-perceived temperature indices: indoor Apparent Temperature (ATin), outdoor shaded Apparent Temperature (ATout), Discomfort Index (DI), Effective Temperature (ET), Heat Index (HI), Humidex (HMI), Modified Discomfort Index (MDI), Net Effective Temperature (NET), Wet-Bulb Temperature (WBT), simplified Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (sWBGT), and Wind Chill Temperature (WCT). This daily dataset has a high spatial resolution of 1 km × 1 km and covers the North China Plain from January 2003 to December 2020. It has high accuracy with averaged determination coefficient, mean absolute error, and root mean squared error of 0.987, 0.970 °C, and 1.292 °C, respectively. The dataset is stacked by year and each stack consists of 365 daily images in NetCDF format by day of the year. The unit of the dataset is 0.01 degree Celsius (°C), and the values are stored in an integer type (Int16) to save storage space, and thus need to be divided by 100 to get the values in degree Celcius when in use. The geographic coordinate system of the dataset is World Geodetic System (WGS) 1984 Coordinate System. Naming rules and other details can be found in "README.pdf". If you have any questions when using the HiTIC-NCP dataset, please feel free to contact Mr. Xiang Li via lixiang97@mail2.sysu.edu.cn, Dr. Ming Luo via luom38@mail.sysu.edu.cn, or Dr. Yongquan Zhao via yqzhao@link.cuhk.edu.hk. More details on the procedure of producing the HiTIC-NCP dataset and its accuracy assessment can be found in: Li, X., Luo, M*., Zhao, Y*., Zhang, H., Ge, E., Huang, Z., Wu, S., Wang, P., Wang X., Tang Y. (2023). A daily high-resolution (1 km) human thermal index collection over the North China Plain from 2003 to 2020. Scientific Data, 10, 634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02535-y

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→