MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393517238 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3678551

Mitigating Turnover with Code Review Recommendation: Balancing Expertise, Workload, and Knowledge Distribution

2020· dataset· en· W4393517238 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Mirsaeedi, Peter C. Rigby

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkloadComputer scienceCode (set theory)Distribution (mathematics)Operating systemProgramming languageMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data for the paper: Ehsan Mirsaeedi and Peter C. Rigby. 2020. Mitigating Turnover with Code Review Recommendation: Balancing Expertise, Workload, and Knowledge Distribution. In 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE ’20), May 23–29, 2020, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377811.3380335 Code and tools available at <pre>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3678570</pre>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207