Modulation of bioelectric cues in the evolution of flying fishes [Data set]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assembled reference contigs for protein-coding exons and conserved non-coding regions from targeted sequence enrichment of beloniform fishes. Current citation: Daane JM, Blum N, Lanni J, Boldt H, Iovine MK, Johnson SL, Lovejoy NR, and MP Harris. (2021). Novel regulators of growth identified in the evolution of fin proportion in flying fish. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.05.434157 -contigs.tar.gz contains the assembled contigs for each species. Each contig represents a targeted region with the addition of flanking DNA sequence -cnes.tar.gz contains the targeted conserved non-coding regions isolated from the larger contigs in contigs.tar.gz -exons.tar.gz contains the targeted protein coding exons isolated from the larger contigs in contigs.tar.gz -translated_exons.tar.gz contains the translated protein coding exons from exons.tar.gz -Beloniformes.tre is the species tree -medaka_cne_great.txt contains the associations between the assembled CNEs and neighboring protein-coding genes based on the GREAT approach
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".