MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393542943 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10048770

Evergreen needleleaf forest pigment, MONI-PAM, eddy-covariance, and tower-scale remote sensing data across four different sites

2023· dataset· en· W4393542943 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zoe Pierrat

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEddy covarianceEvergreenEnvironmental scienceScale (ratio)TowerEvergreen forestRemote sensingGeographyBiologyEcologyCartographyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data presented here are from four evergreen needleleaf forests, which include boreal forest locations in Alaska (DEJU, mean annual temperature = 0.4 degrees Celsius [°C], latitude = 63.9 degrees north [°N]) and Saskatchewan, Canada (Ca-Obs, 1.3°C, 54.0°N), a high elevation forest in Colorado (US-NR1, 2.8°C, 40.0°N), and a longleaf pine forest in Florida (OSBS, 21.1°C, 29.7°N). Included are needle-scale pigment data from the DEJU, US-NR1, and OSBS sites; MONI-PAM fluoresence data from the DEJU site, tower-scale eddy-covariance, meterological, and remotely sensed solar-induced fluoresence and vegetation index data across all four sites. More information on these data can be found in the accompanying publication:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207